How Texas [divorce] Courts get it wrong!
  • Home
    • Fundamental Liberty Interest
  • They just get it wrong
  • What is in a word?
  • Appellate courts do not seem to always agree
  • "You Keep Using That Word, I Do Not Think It Means What You Think It Means"
  • 153.252. REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION Explained
  • New Page
  • Concern strategy
  • Priorities are not the children
It's all about "IF", the concern strategy
When a person is accused by someone in the court because they claim to be "Concerned" about something that might happen but has not or does not happen.
It all comes down to one allegation;
  • (s)he abused______ (fill in the blank, children, spouse, etc)
The only problem is that it has never happened. It is just enough of a flag however to get a knee jerk reaction from the courts to go straight into "protect mode".   
This question informs the concern strategy where they try to avoid the concrete evidence and replace it with hypothetical hysterics and allegations.
  • What if (s)he does this_____?
  • What if (s)he did that_____?
  • Because (s)he did this_____, the children did that_____!
  • Because (s)he might do this_____, the children need to be protected!
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
    • Fundamental Liberty Interest
  • They just get it wrong
  • What is in a word?
  • Appellate courts do not seem to always agree
  • "You Keep Using That Word, I Do Not Think It Means What You Think It Means"
  • 153.252. REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION Explained
  • New Page
  • Concern strategy
  • Priorities are not the children